Did anybody else get no feedback? The setup and delivery is just awkward:
" Program Committee members reviewing papers were asked to provide brief reviewer-type comments to authors whenever possible. As authors, we all know the value of "blind" reviewer comments – as well as the cost and difficulty of obtaining them! If the reviewers of your paper provided comments, they are below:
----------------------
----------------------"
Gee, thanks. Glad I paid money for no feedback whatsoever. Not even "too specific" or "too technical" or "not developed enough."